Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Sea level rise: what has happened so far
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 14:05 GMT le 10 juin 2009 +4
Sea level has been rising globally since the late 1700s. This rise has accelerated in recent decades, thanks to increased melting of glaciers and ice sheets due to a warmer climate, plus the fact that warmer oceans are less dense and expand, further increasing sea level. Though sea level rise appears to have slowed over the past five years, it will significantly accelerate if the climate warms the 2 - 3°C it is expected to this century. If these forecasts of a warmer world prove accurate, higher sea levels will be a formidable challenge for millions of people world-wide during the last half of this century. Sea level rise represents one of my personal top two climate change concerns (drought is the other). I'll present a series of blog posts over the coming months focusing on at-risk areas in the U.S., Caribbean, and world-wide. Today, I focus on the observed sea level rise since the Ice Age.

What's at stake
Higher sea levels mean increased storm surge inundation, coastal erosion, loss of low-lying land areas, and salt water contamination of underground drinking water supplies. About 44% of the Earth's 6.7 billion people live within 150 km (93 miles) of the coast, and 600 million people live at an elevation less than ten meters (33 feet). Eight of the ten largest cities in the world are sited on the ocean coast. In the U.S., the coastal population has doubled over the past 50 years. Fourteen of the twenty largest urban centers are located within 100 km of the coast, and are less than ten meters above sea level (McGranahan et al., 2007). The population of many vulnerable coastal regions are expected to double by 2050, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Sea level rise since the Ice Age
Before the most recent Ice Age, sea level was about 4 - 6 meters (13 - 20 feet) higher than at present. Then, during the Ice Age, sea level dropped 120 meters (395 ft) as water evaporated from the oceans precipitated out onto the great land-based ice sheets. The former ocean water remained frozen in those ice sheets during the Ice Age, but began being released 12,000 - 15,000 years ago as the Ice Age ended and the climate warmed. Sea level increased about 115 meters over a several thousand year period, rising 40 mm/year (1.6"/yr) during one 500-year pulse of melting 14,600 years ago. The rate of sea level rise slowed to 11 mm/year (0.43"/yr) during the period 7,000 - 14,000 years ago (Bard et al., 1996), then further slowed to 0.5 mm/yr 6,000 - 3,000 years ago. About 2,000 - 3,000 years ago, the sea level stopped rising, and remained fairly steady until the late 1700s (IPCC 2007). One exception to this occurred during the Medieval Warm Period of 1100 - 1200 A.D., when warm conditions similar to today's climate caused the sea level to rise 5 - 8" (12 - 21 cm) higher than present (Grinsted et al., 2008). This was probably the highest the sea has been since the beginning of the Ice Age, 110,000 years ago. There is a fair bit of uncertainty in all these estimates, since we don't have direct measurements of the sea level.


Figure 1. Global sea level from 200 A.D. to 2000, as reconstructed from proxy records of sea level by Moberg et al. 2005. The thick black line is reconstructed sea level using tide gauges (Jevrejeva, 2006). The lightest gray shading shows the 5 - 95% uncertainty in the estimates, and the medium gray shading denotes the one standard deviation error estimate. The highest global sea level of the past 110,000 years likely occurred during the Medieval Warm Period of 1100 - 1200 A.D., when warm conditions similar to today's climate caused the sea level to rise 5 - 8" (12 - 21 cm) higher than present. Image credit: Grinsted, A., J.C. Moore, and S. Jevrejeva, 2009, "Reconstructing sea level from paleo and projected temperatures 200 to 2100 AD", Climate Dynamics, DOI 10.1007/s00382-008-0507-2, 06 January 2009.

Sea level rise over the past 300 years
Direct measurements of sea level using tide gauges began in Amsterdam in 1700. Additional tide gauges began recording data in Liverpool, England in 1768 and in Stockholm, Sweden in 1774. These gauges suggest that a steady acceleration of sea rise of 0.01 mm per year squared began in the late 1700s, resulting in a rise in sea level of 2.4" (6 cm, 0.6 mm/yr) during the 19th century and 7.5" (19 cm, 1.9 mm/yr) during the 20th century (Jevrejeva et al., 2008). There is considerable uncertainty in just how much sea level rise has occurred over the past few centuries, though. Measuring global average sea level rise is a very tricky business. For starters, one must account for the tides, which depend on the positions of the Earth and Moon on a cycle that repeats itself once every 18.6 years. Tide gauges are scattered, with varying lengths of record. The data must be corrected since land is sinking in some regions, due to pumping of ground water, oil and gas extraction, and natural compaction of sediments. Also, the land is rising in other regions, such as Northern Europe, where it is rebounding from the lost weight of the melted glaciers that covered the region during the last Ice Age. Ocean currents, precipitation, and evaporation can cause a 20 inch (50 cm) difference in sea level in different portions of the ocean. As a result of all this uncertainty, the 1996 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report gave a range of 4 - 10" (10 - 25 cm) for the observed sea level rise of the 20th century. The 2007 IPCC report narrowed this range a bit, to 5 - 9" (12 - 22 cm), or 1.2 - 2.2 mm/year. Rates of sea level rise are much higher in many regions. In the U.S., the highest rates of sea-level rise are along the Mississippi Delta region--over 10 mm/yr, or 1 inch/2.5 years (USGS, 2006). This large relative rise is due, in large part, to the fact that the land is sinking.


Figure 2. Absolute sea level rise between 1955 and 2003 as computed from tide gauges and satellite imagery data. The data has been corrected for the rising or sinking of land due to crustal motions or subsidence of the land, so the relative sea level rise along the coast will be different than this. The total rise (in inches) for the 48-year period is given in the top scale, and the rate in mm/year is given in the bottom scale. The regional sea level variations shown here resulted not only from the input of additional water from melting of glaciers and ice caps, but also from changes in ocean temperature and density, as well as changes in precipitation, ocean currents, and river discharge. Image credit: IPCC, 2007

Sea level rise over the past 15 years
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 report, sea level accelerated from the 1.2 - 2.2 mm/yr observed during the 20th century to 3.1 mm/year during the period 1993 - 2003. These estimates come from high resolution measurements from satellite radar altimeters, which began in 1992. Tide gauges showed a similar level of sea level rise during that ten-year period. The IPCC attributed more than half of this rise (1.6 mm/yr) to the fact that the ocean expanded in size due to increased temperatures. Another 1.2 mm/yr rise came from melting of Greenland, West Antarctica, and other land-based ice, and about 10% of the rise was unaccounted for. However, during the period 2003 - 2008, sea level rise slowed to 2.5 mm/year, according to measurements of Earth's gravity from the GRACE satellites (Cazenave et al., 2008). This reduction in sea level rise probably occurred because ocean sea surface temperatures have not warmed since 2003 (Figure 3). The authors concluded that sea level rise due to ocean warming decreased more than a factor of five from 2003 - 2008, compared to 1993 - 2003, contributing only 0.3 mm/yr vs. the 1.6 mm/yr previously.


Figure 3. Global average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) from 1990-2008. SSTs have not increased in the past seven years. Image credit: NASA/GISS.

For more information
The best source of information I found while compiling my sea level pages was the Coastal Sensitivity to Sea-Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region report by the U.S. Climate Science Program. It has a huge number of references to all the latest science being done on sea level rise.

References
Bard, E., et al., 1996, "Sea level record from Tahiti corals and the timing of deglacial meltwater discharge", Nature 382, pp241-244, doi:10.1038/382241a0.

Cazenave et al., 2008, "Sea level budget over 2003-2008: A reevaluation from satellite altimetry and Argo", Global and Planetary Change, 2008; DOI:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.10.004

Grinsted, A., J.C. Moore, and S. Jevrejeva, 2009, "Reconstructing sea level from paleo and projected temperatures 200 to 2100 AD", Climate Dynamics, DOI 10.1007/s00382-008-0507-2, 06 January 2009.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, 996 pp.

Jevrejeva, S., J.C. Moore, A. Grinsted,, and P.L. Woodworth, 2008, "Recent global sea level acceleration started over 200 years ago?", Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L08715, doi:10.1029/2008GL033611, 2008.

McGranahan, G., D. Balk, and B. Anderson, 2007, "The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones", Environment & Urbanization, 19(1), 17-37.

Moberg, A., et al., 2005, "Highly variable northern hemisphere temperature reconstructed from low- and high-resolution proxy data", Nature 433, pp613-617, doi:10.1038/nature03265.

United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2006, National Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Sea-Level Rise: Preliminary Results for the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Coast, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-179.

Tropical update
The tropical Atlantic is quiet, and the only region worth watching is the Western Caribbean, which could see formation of a tropical disturbance with heavy thunderstorm activity this weekend.

Jeff Masters
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 851 - 901

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37Blog Index

851. hydrus 14:30 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting Patrap:
Quoting Squid28:
Lets see, here we are at around post 800 and something and I keep seeing comments interjected about the doctors blog, global warming mumbo jumbo etc. I wonder who we have to thank for all of this..



Folks always skew and duck what they dont understand or cant comprehend.


Kinda Like in the Dark ages..but without the BE-heading and all.
LOL LOL...
Member Since: 27 septembre 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14243
852. weathermanwannabe 14:30 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting KEHCharleston:
Ok, I think I've got it.

Upper level shows how the environment is setting up.

Surface is where I look to see storm potential.

Thanks all (and correct me if I do not have this right)


I am a complete amateur but the concept I think is correct; once the depression or storm forms, then, we start talking about favorable conditions at the surface, and, at the upper levels which allow the storm to become "vertically" stacked from the surface up through the upper levels.....Then, once the engine gets going, all the relevent conditions need to keep "firing on all cylinders" so to speak to keep the system alive and viable..i.e. cooler waters will disrupt the heat part of the engine at the surface, or, excessive wind sheer over the top will also disrupt the system (name your poison-dry air-sheer-cool water temps, and, on and on)...It takes a lot of favorable covergence of several factors to support cyclogenisis and storm formation/favorable debvelopment....IMHO
Member Since: 8 août 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 6675
853. Orcasystems 14:31 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Member Since: 1 octobre 2007 Posts: 77 Comments: 26077
854. stillwaiting 14:37 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
I think we just had a small quake here in sarasota????
Member Since: 5 octobre 2007 Posts: 20 Comments: 4970
855. stillwaiting 14:38 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
something just shook my house!!!(a little,not alot!!)
Member Since: 5 octobre 2007 Posts: 20 Comments: 4970
856. CaneWarning 14:39 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting stillwaiting:
I think we just had a small quake here in sarasota????


Interesting... It's possible.
Member Since: 26 avril 2009 Posts: 3 Comments: 3667
857. TampaSpin 14:39 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
9N 52W will become the first Named Storm of the year....Good Morning everyone
Member Since: 2 septembre 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
858. weathermanwannabe 14:41 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting stillwaiting:
something just shook my house!!!(a little,not alot!!)


Process of elimination (shock wave from car/air plane crash?).....
Member Since: 8 août 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 6675
859. Patrap 14:41 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Member Since: 3 juillet 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
860. conchygirl 14:41 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting TampaSpin:
9N 52W will become the first Named Storm of the year....Good Morning everyone
Oh no! Morning Tampa!
Member Since: 11 juin 2008 Posts: 24 Comments: 5910
861. Patrap 14:42 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
er,..maybe a Big ol truck carrying dirt.
Member Since: 3 juillet 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
862. DaytonaBeachWatcher 14:42 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
not according to the usgs

Link
Member Since: 29 juin 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 1125
863. captainhunter 14:45 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Most likely a sonic boom off shore. We get them all the time here in Panama City Beach.
Member Since: 12 août 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 428
864. IKE 14:45 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Wishcasting storms.

Wishcasting earthquakes?

Need some 80's music to loosen things up.

GO!
Member Since: 9 juin 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
865. stillwaiting 14:45 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
no quake,there working on the property behind me,I just went outside and it was a backhoe slamming into the pavement,we did have a 6.0 about 200miles offshore of tampa area about 3 or 4yrs ago!!!!:)
Member Since: 5 octobre 2007 Posts: 20 Comments: 4970
866. weathermanwannabe 14:46 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting stillwaiting:
no quake,there working on the property behind me,I just went outside and it was a backhoe slamming into the pavement,we did have a 6.0 about 200miles offshore of tampa area about 3 or 4yrs ago!!!!:)


There Ya Go...That backhoe will do it every time...
Member Since: 8 août 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 6675
867. stillwaiting 14:47 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
hey,hey now Ike,go to your room and take another hit,lol;)
Member Since: 5 octobre 2007 Posts: 20 Comments: 4970
868. TampaSpin 14:48 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Spin is starting and does show up on Vorticity....i pointed this out yesterday on my update.....TampaSpin Update

Member Since: 2 septembre 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
869. IKE 14:48 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting stillwaiting:
hey,hey know Ike,go to your room and take another hit,lol;)


Just a teasin w/ya.
Member Since: 9 juin 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
870. Patrap 14:49 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
871. Orcasystems 14:49 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting TampaSpin:
9N 52W will become the first Named Storm of the year....Good Morning everyone


You mean the little blob under 35 knots of shear?

Member Since: 1 octobre 2007 Posts: 77 Comments: 26077
872. stillwaiting 14:50 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
I know Ikie,your one of the good guys,lol...
Member Since: 5 octobre 2007 Posts: 20 Comments: 4970
873. stillwaiting 14:51 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
pat:I love that old school classic "frosty the snowman",takes me back to my childhood days!!!
Member Since: 5 octobre 2007 Posts: 20 Comments: 4970
874. LoneStarWeather 14:52 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Yukon Cornelius rules! Ya-hoooooooooo!
Member Since: 8 septembre 2001 Posts: 0 Comments: 391
875. Patrap 14:53 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Yukon cant find a storm track,,,so were safe until Jeff Leaves for London I guess.
Member Since: 3 juillet 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
876. Patrap 14:54 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
I want to Be a "Met"

Member Since: 3 juillet 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
877. KEHCharleston 14:55 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Shear will decrease at 9N 52W by tomorrow.



Location is not where one would expect a June storm.
Member Since: 19 août 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 2490
878. beell 14:56 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting KEHCharleston:
Ok, I think I've got it.

Upper level shows how the environment is setting up.

Surface is where I look to see storm potential.

Thanks all (and correct me if I do not have this right)


I think you got it, KEH. One other thing-The upper level ridges and troughs, and cut-offs depicted on the models (500mb, 300mb, 250mb, etc.) usually have the greatest run-to-run consistancy. They may differ a little but not usually a large difference. And that makes sense. The bigger picture is easier to model and will eventually translate to the the surface. It's that "eventually" part I have trouble with!

Member Since: 11 septembre 2007 Posts: 124 Comments: 12834
879. IKE 14:57 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
12Z NAM


And now...I Ran
for your R & R pleasure. Requested at 1-800-iluvrok.......
Member Since: 9 juin 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
880. KEHCharleston 14:58 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Thanks beell.
Member Since: 19 août 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 2490
881. Orcasystems 15:00 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Have fun guys & Gals, back in an hour or so from work.
Member Since: 1 octobre 2007 Posts: 77 Comments: 26077
882. MeterologistDewon9 15:01 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Just curious, is it tryin 2 develop a eye circulation??

883. TampaSpin 15:02 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
871. Orcasystems 10:49 AM EDT on June 11, 2009
Quoting TampaSpin:
9N 52W will become the first Named Storm of the year....Good Morning everyone


You mean the little blob under 35 knots of shear?


Orca did i say it was going to develop in that location.....You Question everything i say on here even if i said i was going to the JOHN i would believe....People are really getting very tired of your attacking!

Member Since: 2 septembre 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
884. IKE 15:04 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting TampaSpin:
871. Orcasystems 10:49 AM EDT on June 11, 2009
Quoting TampaSpin:
9N 52W will become the first Named Storm of the year....Good Morning everyone


You mean the little blob under 35 knots of shear?


Orca did i say it was going to develop in that location.....You Question everything i say on here even if i said i was going to the JOHN i would believe....People are really getting very tired of your attacking!




Member Since: 9 juin 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
885. TampaSpin 15:05 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
877. KEHCharleston 10:55 AM EDT on June 11, 2009
Shear will decrease at 9N 52W by tomorrow.


Yep your correct....I know it is very unusual for something to develop in that location...I don't see it happening until it gets to the Caribbean as i stated yesterday in my update...But, yes Shear will be dropping big time in the Tropics.....
Member Since: 2 septembre 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
886. KEHCharleston 15:07 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Member Since: 19 août 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 2490
887. TampaSpin 15:07 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
884. IKE 11:04 AM EDT on June 11, 2009

Darn thanks IKE it could not figure out was was flapping behind me......LMAO
Member Since: 2 septembre 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
888. NEwxguy 15:08 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
884. Ike,good one!!
Member Since: 6 septembre 2007 Posts: 815 Comments: 13069
889. TampaSpin 15:09 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting NEwxguy:
884. Ike,good one!!


Hey my freind! Looks like Big Papa is heating up.....
Member Since: 2 septembre 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
890. NEwxguy 15:10 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting TampaSpin:


Hey my freind! Looks like Big Papa is heating up.....


Yeh, a little bit,we'll just have to wait and see
Member Since: 6 septembre 2007 Posts: 815 Comments: 13069
891. Drakoen 15:14 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Observations support a broad circulation. Upper level winds remain unfavorable for development.
Member Since: 28 octobre 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29010
892. beell 15:14 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
06Z GFS 200-850mb vertical shear

Values are in "meters per second" Mutiply by 2 to get approximation in knots.
Member Since: 11 septembre 2007 Posts: 124 Comments: 12834
893. KEHCharleston 15:16 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting TampaSpin:
877. KEHCharleston 10:55 AM EDT on June 11, 2009
Shear will decrease at 9N 52W by tomorrow.


Yep your correct....I know it is very unusual for something to develop in that location...I don't see it happening until it gets to the Caribbean as i stated yesterday in my update...But, yes Shear will be dropping big time in the Tropics.....

In order to be in a typical location for June, it would need to move a fair distance west and a wee bit north.

Would be right on for July though, right where she sits at the moment.
Member Since: 19 août 2008 Posts: 6 Comments: 2490
895. TampaSpin 15:22 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting KEHCharleston:

In order to be in a typical location for June, it would need to move a fair distance west and a wee bit north.

Would be right on for July though, right where she sits at the moment.


YOu can already see the Shear dropping and possible LL Spin developing.....it shows up also on the 850mb Vorticity...




Member Since: 2 septembre 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
896. NEwxguy 15:22 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
local NWS indicated something possible for end of the weekend or beginning of next week,possible low of the east coast,but they are not commiting themselves to what.
Member Since: 6 septembre 2007 Posts: 815 Comments: 13069
897. IKE 15:22 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting Drakoen:
Observations support a broad circulation. Upper level winds remain unfavorable for development.


When there's about 3 hours worth of visibles, then I can see it.
Member Since: 9 juin 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
898. IKE 15:24 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Just east of that main vorticity.
Member Since: 9 juin 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
899. Drakoen 15:25 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting IKE:


When there's about 3 hours worth of visibles, then I can see it.


It's not really something you can see by looking at visibles. It's that broad.
Member Since: 28 octobre 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29010
900. IKE 15:26 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
Quoting Drakoen:


It's not really something you can see by looking at visibles. It's that broad.


I can see a spin.
Member Since: 9 juin 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
901. Cavin Rawlins 15:26 GMT le 11 juin 2009    
The cloud pattern clearly defines the surface trough

Member Since: 24 juillet 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076

Viewing: 851 - 901

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Local Weather
Clear
77 ° F
Ciel dégagé
Community Activity