NOAA's forecast: a very active, possibly hyperactive Atlantic hurricane season
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issued its 2010 Atlantic hurricane season forecast today. NOAA forecasts a very active and possibly hyperactive season. They give an 85% chance of an above-normal season, a 10% chance of a near-normal season, and just a 5% chance of a below-normal season. NOAA predicts a 70% chance that there will be 14 - 23 named storms, 8 - 14 hurricanes, and 3 - 7 major hurricanes, with an Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) in the 155% - 270% of normal range. If we take the midpoint of these numbers, NOAA is calling for 18.5 named storms, 11 hurricanes, 5 major hurricanes, and an ACE index 210% of normal. A season with an ACE index over 175% is considered "hyperactive." An average season has 10 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and 2 intense hurricanes. The forecasters note that in regards to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico,
"Historically, all above normal seasons have produced at least one named storm in the Gulf of Mexico, and 95% of those seasons have at least two named storms in the Gulf. Most of this activity (80%) occurs during August-October. However, 50% of above normal seasons have had at least one named storm in the region during June-July."
The forecasters cited the following main factors that will influence the coming season:
1) Expected above-average SSTs in the hurricane Main Development Region (MDR), from the Caribbean to the coast of Africa. SSTs in the MDR are currently at record levels, and the forecasters note that several climate models are predicting record or near-record SSTs during the peak portion of hurricane season (August - October.) "Two other instances of very warm SSTs have been observed in the MDR during February-April (1958 and 1969). In both years, the SST anomaly subsequently decreased by roughly 50% during the summer months. For 2010, although the record SST departures may well decrease somewhat, we still expect a continuation of above average SSTs throughout the Atlantic hurricane season. "
2) We are in an active period of hurricane activity that began in 1995, thanks to a natural decades-long cycle in hurricane activity called the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). "During 1995-2009, some key aspects of the tropical multi-decadal signal within the MDR have included warmer than average SSTs, reduced vertical wind shear and weaker easterly trade winds, below-average sea-level pressure, and a configuration of the African easterly jet that is more conducive to hurricane development from tropical waves moving off the African coast. Many of these atmospheric features typically become evident during late April and May, as the atmosphere across the tropical Atlantic and Africa begins to transition into its summertime monsoon state."
3) There will either be La Niña or neutral conditions in the Equatorial Eastern Pacific. El Niño is gone, and it's demise will likely act to decrease wind shear over the tropical Atlantic, allowing more hurricanes to form. "La Niña contributes to reduced vertical wind shear over the western tropical Atlantic which, when combined with conditions associated with the ongoing high activity era and warm Atlantic SSTs, increases the probability of an exceptionally active Atlantic hurricane season (Bell and Chelliah 2006). NOAA's high-resolution CFS model indicates the development of La Niña-like circulation and precipitation anomalies during July."
How accurate are the NOAA seasonal hurricane forecasts?
A talk presented by NHC's Eric Blake at the 2010 29th Annual AMS Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology studied the accuracy of NOAA's late May seasonal Atlantic hurricane forecasts, using the mid-point of the range given for the number of named storms, hurricanes, intense hurricanes, and ACE index. Over the past twelve years, a forecast made using climatology was in error, on average, by 3.6 named storms, 2.5 hurricanes, and 1.7 intense hurricanes. NOAA's May forecast was not significantly better than climatology for these quantities, with average errors of 3.5 named storms, 2.3 hurricanes, and 1.4 intense hurricanes. Only NOAA's May ACE forecast was significantly better than climatology, averaging 58 ACE units off, compared to the 74 for climatology. Using another way to measure skill, the Mean Squared Error, May NOAA forecasts for named storms, hurricanes, and intense hurricanes had a skill of between 5% and 21% over a climatology forecast (Figure 2). Not surprisingly, NOAA's August forecasts were much better than the May forecasts, and did significantly better than a climatology forecast.
Figure 1. Mean absolute error for the May and August NOAA seasonal hurricane forecasts (1999 - 2009 for May, 1998 - 2009 for August), and for forecasts made using climatology from the past five years. A forecast made using climatology was in error, on average, by 3.6 named storms, 2.5 hurricanes, and 1.7 intense hurricanes. NOAA's May forecast was not significantly better than climatology for these quantities, with average errors of 3.5 named storms, 2.3 hurricanes, and 1.4 intense hurricanes. Only NOAA's May ACE forecast was significantly better than climatology, averaging 58 ACE units off, compared to the 74 for climatology. Image credit: Verification of 12 years of NOAA seasonal hurricane forecasts, National Hurricane Center.
How do NOAA's seasonal hurricane forecasts compare to CSU and TSR?
Two other major seasonal hurricane forecasts will be released next week. On June 2, Phil Klotzbach and Bill Gray of Colorado State University (CSU) issue their forecast, and the British firm Tropical Storm Risk (TSR) will issue their outlook on June 4. A three-way comparison of the forecast accuracy of the three groups' forecast (Figure 2) reveals that all three organizations enjoy some success at making accurate seasonal forecasts, with NOAA and CSU making the best late May/early June forecasts overall. While the skill of these forecasts is low, they are useful for businesses such as the insurance industry.
Figure 2. Comparison of the percent improvement over climatology for May and August seasonal hurricane forecasts for the Atlantic from NOAA, CSU and TSR from 1999-2009 (May) and 1998-2009 (August). using the Mean Squared Error. Image credit: Verification of 12 years of NOAA seasonal hurricane forecasts, National Hurricane Center.
Central American disturbance
The Atlantic is currently quiet, with the non-tropical storm (90L) that we were watching now no longer a concern. There is an area of disturbed weather (90E) just off the Pacific coast of Mexico that will be a major concern for southern Mexico and much of Central America over the next 3 - 4 days. The disturbance will bring heavy rains to Central America during the remainder of the week, potentially bringing serious flooding rains to portions of Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua. NHC is giving the disturbance a high (>60% chance) of the disturbance developing into a tropical depression by Saturday. There is the potential for disturbed weather accompanying the disturbance--or the disturbance itself--to push into the Western Caribbean early next week and pose a threat to develop into a tropical depression. While there is high wind shear over the northern Caribbean, shear may be low enough to allow development should the disturbance stay in the southern reaches of the Caribbean. None of the models are currently calling for this to happen, and I think the threat is low. Any storm that develops in the Caribbean in the coming week would get steered to the northeast and will not pose a threat to the Gulf of Mexico. Wunderbloggers Weather456 and StormW have more on the tropics.
Figure 3. Visible satellite image of the Central American disturbance 90E this morning.
Oil threat for the coast of Louisiana to decrease this weekend
Light winds from the north or west are expected to prevail across the northern Gulf of Mexico through Friday, resulting in a lessened threat of oiling to the Louisiana shoreline, according to the latest trajectory forecasts from NOAA. However, the latest runs of the GFS model indicate a return to onshore winds out of the southwest for most of next week, which will likely bring oil back towards shore. At greatest risk will be the coast of Louisiana, and there will be heightened risk to Mississippi, Alabama, and the Florida Panhandle. I'll a have a more in-depth discussion of the oil spill forecast in Friday's blog.
Oil spill resources
My post, What a hurricane would do the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
My post on the Southwest Florida "Forbidden Zone" where surface oil will rarely go
My post on what oil might do to a hurricane
NOAA trajectory forecasts
Deepwater Horizon Unified Command web site
Oil Spill Academic Task Force
University of South Florida Ocean Circulation Group oil spill forecasts
ROFFS Deepwater Horizon page
Surface current forecasts from NOAA's HYCOM model
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery from the University of Miami
Join the Hurricane Haven with Dr. Jeff Masters: a new Internet radio show
Beginning next week, I'll be experimenting with a live 1-hour Internet radio show called "Hurricane Haven." The show will be aired at 4pm EDT on Tuesdays, with the first show June 1. Listeners will be able to call in and ask questions. Some topics I'll cover on the first show:
1) What's going on in the tropics right now
2) Preview of the coming hurricane season
3) How a hurricane might affect the oil spill
4) How the oil spill might affect a hurricane
5) New advancements in hurricane science presented at this month's AMS Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology
6) Haiti's vulnerability to a hurricane this season
I hope you can tune in to the broadcast, which will be at http://www.wunderground.com/wxradio/wubroadcast.h tml. If not, the show will be recorded and stored as a podcast.
Jeff Masters
Reader Comments
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 — Blog Index
Have heard no word on that..it aint supposed to be tried until after this attempt..and thats doubtful as the Junk shot can do as much harm to the Rams as good.
Meh, I don't know, but looks like they bumped up the pump.
Im just glad no one was up under the stump. I was young at the time and probably shouldnt have been sawing it but it was a disaster everyone pitches in... if anyone had been in the root hole they would have been utterly flattened. after it stood up you couldnt tell it had ever been down. Minus being nothing but a stump left.
They losing too much mud though the leaks, IMO
yeah .. everyone watch the feed ... looks like it will either work or blow up ....
You cant do the Junk shot until after the Top Kill runs..only after they cant pump cement ..will they even consider the Junk SHot,..cus once thats done,,no more Mud or cement can be pumped into the BOP.
This aint working ..as Oil is easily seen taking over the Plume,..
I am thinking yes
new gf
yeah..
I believe so, based on satellite imagery and surface observations showing a low pressure center in the area relative to the surrounding stations.
it wasnt a junk "shot" they just added bigger particles to the flow
Yeah, but either the Junk stops the flow, or it gets blasted out.
Better to try to stop the flow with the Junk and hope it holds until August ??
GFS 00z has this in 8 hours:
I give them a 10% chance at best to stop the flow.
Hi Pat,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "mud" is actually "drilling fluid", which when used in this fashion, is supposed to act sort of like plaque build-up in arteries. The intention in this case of course, is to completely clog the well pipe to a depth that would allow the safe addition of concrete. But if what is on video is excess mud, and the oil is being pushed further down, does that mean we'll continue to see the "leak" until they add the concrete?
I know that..I worked on Hercules 21 for Chevron in the 90's.
I never mentioned Junk Shot...
You sure?
Something has partially blocked the leak on the right, there was close-up of it 1/2 hr ago.
The Drill fluids or Mud act like a Stopper as its specific gravity is heavier than the OIl ..ina perfect well..the Riser Holds the Mud to offset the UP pressure from the well bore ,or push.
The mud keeps the OIL gas mix below the BOP and under pressure behind the BOP..th top Kill is flowing Mud into the BOP and into the well bore to try and staunch the Flow..it did that with some success earlier,but after they checked the pressures,they returned to flowing in the mud..but Im seeing no Luck.
In my view.
And the Lack of ROV angles show they kinda mystified or giving up.
Good call
I not Pat, but-
IF they can get mud down the hole, in enough quantity, then the weight of the mud (18,000 feet in a pipe straight down) will be enough to stop the oil coming up the pipe. The mud is about 22 lb/gal.
Then they can cement.
Most Likely something in the flow,or a piece of the BOP broke off inside the System..or BOP itself
That's disappointing. I was hoping the compaction process was just taking longer than they'd hoped. Maybe it's - Lord I Hope So - just a temporary snag.
I wondered about that. If it was soft material (rubber, rope, junk) it would have been eroded away in no time.
This is also why it is raining where you are.
If your still here take a look at the gfs,rain rain and more rain coming,Flaring up just to the east,run for the hills..lol..I'm out.
Viewing: 1751 - 1801
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 — Blog Index