Weather Extremes |
|
| Posted by: Christopher C. Burt, 20:30 GMT le 29 octobre 2011 | +8 |
| Permalink | A A A |
|
|
Christopher C. Burt is the author of 'Extreme Weather; A Guide and Record Book'. He studied meteorology at the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
|
Tropical Blogs
Tropical Weather Stickers®
Page: 1 — Blog Index
I'd be interested to know how river dams and engineered modifications in the rivers to support agriculture have changed how rivers there respond to excessive rainfall.
Bangkok evacuation as the Chao Phraya river threatens to burst its banks. Report by Anna Drury. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/itn and follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/itn
03:10 GMT le 31 octobre 2011
Good question. The short answer is yes, Bangkok is subsiding and it's future is certainly in peril. I believe, the city has sunk about 1/2 meter in the past 20 years, but don't quote me on that figure.
Perhaps no major city (sorry New Orleans is not a major city) has sunk like Bangkok has. One thing going for them is that it is a very rich city and as such has the resources to build a system of dikes to protect itself or take other measures for its survival.
Watch out Dhaka!
P.S. No, agriculture is probably not responsible for the subsidence of Bangkok. Construction and consequently population increase is. This city is literally sinking under its own weight and the sucking up of the aquifers that feed its water consumption are literally sucking it underwater. (NOTE: in terms of how agriculture might be playing a role in that, well, perhaps). Excessive rainfall isn't the problem in the long term. The city is sinking and nothing short of a massive levee project will save it from future flood events, whether those are because of tides or rainfall runoff.
Maybe re-think the obvious.
New Orleans: A Geopolitical Prize
By George Friedman
New Orleans is not optional for the United States' commercial infrastructure. It is a terrible place for a city to be located, but exactly the place where a city must exist. With that as a given, a city will return there because the alternatives are too devastating. The harvest is coming, and that means that the port will have to be opened soon. As in Iraq, premiums will be paid to people prepared to endure the hardships of working in New Orleans. But in the end, the city will return because it has to.
Geopolitics is the stuff of permanent geographical realities and the way they interact with political life. Geopolitics created New Orleans. Geopolitics caused American presidents to obsess over its safety. And geopolitics will force the city's resurrection, even if it is in the worst imaginable place.
Also check the Author and date..
4 comments and growing.
,but Im not a professional.
Good info though,, Bangkok a Fine place.
As here.
03:23 GMT le 31 octobre 2011
Sorry if you interpreted what I said as a diss of my favorite city in the world, New Orleans. I just meant to say that a city of ten million doesn't compare in the 'major city' league' as New Orleans with a relatively small population and not a center of global commerce.
18:50 GMT le 03 novembre 2011
By saying "ever" seeing Bangkok's situation improving flood-wise, I suspect you mean in the long term. The city is certainly in a very precarious situation since it is slowly subsiding and the Gulf of Thailand is slowly rising (in the long term as a result of AGW). That combination certainly bodes ill for future flood events. However, the country of Thailand has considerable financial resources to work with in order to mitigate future flooding problems. Ultimately, a sophisticated series of dykes and drainage canals will have to be built to protect the urban heart of Bangkok. However another issue is how to protect the vast industrial estates that surround the city and have born the brunt of the flooding this year. I'm not sure how they can be protected in the future, relocating may be the only solution for them.
Viewing: 1 - 12
Page: 1 — Blog Index